The Four Disciplines of Weave

Practising coherence in an age of complexity

This essay continues the Weave series on leadership in complexity. My first 4 posts traced the journey from mastery to versatility. This post turns practice into habit: how leaders create coherence every day.

From theory to practice

Every era produces its own leadership language.
The industrial age gave us control.
The information age gave us efficiency.
The age of complexity demands coherence.

Up to this point, Weave has been about seeing the world differently: recognising that the future belongs to those who can integrate and align. Now we turn from seeing to doing.

The four disciplines that follow are not steps in a sequence. They are interwoven threads you return to again and again.

  1. See the Threads: ontological awareness

  2. Work the Loom: systemic design

  3. Find the Pattern: synthesis and sensemaking

  4. Create the Fabric: cultural coherence

Together they form a fabric spiral: awareness informs design, design enables synthesis, synthesis anchors culture, culture deepens awareness. Each loop strengthens the weave.

Discipline One: See the Threads

Ontological awareness

Purpose: perceive the hidden connections that shape reality.

Most leadership defaults to event analysis: what happened and why. Ontological awareness asks a different question: what meanings, beliefs, and structures make this possible at all? It is the move from incidents to the underlying ontology of the system.

Practices

  • Map perspectives, not just processes: who sees what, and what remains invisible

  • Ask ontological questions: what assumptions are we treating as facts

  • Build perceptual range: combine quantitative signal, qualitative story, and contextual history

Signals you are progressing

  • You can articulate competing truths without forcing premature choice

  • Root causes shift from people and tools to patterns and contexts

  • Strategy conversations begin with framing, not fixes

Pitfalls

  • Confusing analysis with awareness

  • Treating assumptions as risks to mitigate rather than realities to reframe

Heifetz calls it getting on the balcony. You remain in the dance, but you can see its steps.

Discipline Two: Work the Loom

Systemic design

Purpose: build structures that enable flow, collaboration, and adaptation.

Most organisations try to tame complexity with more rules and dashboards. They tighten the weave until intelligence stops flowing. Systemic design loosens it just enough so that information, trust, and accountability can move.

Principles

  • Design for transparency, not supervision: make work and decisions visible by default

  • Design for feedback, not perfection: many short loops beat one long loop

  • Design for coherence, not conformity: shared context over identical methods

Tools and practices

  • Interfaces over hierarchies: clear service contracts between teams, not gatekeeping

  • Rhythms and rituals: cadences for planning, review, and retros that create alignment without centralising control

  • Adaptive governance: decision rights that shift with context and risk

Signals you are progressing

  • Decisions are easier to trace and improve

  • Teams adapt without waiting for permission because the rules of interaction are clear

  • Post-mortems change systems, not just behaviours

Pitfalls

  • Cosmetic transparency without consequences

  • Rituals that become performance rather than learning

Discipline Three: Find the Pattern

Synthesis and sensemaking

Purpose: transform diversity and data into shared understanding and purposeful action.

In complex systems, information multiplies faster than meaning. Leaders drown in metrics while starving for narrative. Sensemaking converts fragments into coherence that people can act on together.

Practices

  • Collect signals, not noise: define essential indicators and retire vanity metrics

  • Synthesize, do not summarise: combine disciplines to produce a better model, not a bigger slide

  • Name the pattern publicly: create a common language that teams can refine

  • Prototype meaning: test interpretations through small, safe-to-try moves

Signals you are progressing

  • People repeat shared phrases that encode cause and effect

  • Experiments increase in quality and learning yield

  • Conflicts shift from positions to patterns

Pitfalls

  • Mistaking volume of data for depth of understanding

  • Private insight that never becomes shared sense

Karl Weick: sensemaking is the ongoing, collective crafting of plausible meaning. It is how humans connect dots that were not designed to align.

Discipline Four: Create the Fabric

Cultural coherence

Purpose: weave purpose, story, and values into a system that endures.

Culture is not the soft stuff. It is the hidden loom that holds every other thread in place. The Weavist treats culture as infrastructure for coherence.

Practices

  • Anchor in purpose: repeat the why until it becomes design criteria

  • Curate shared language: define key terms so decisions do not drift

  • Use rituals as reinforcement: make the values visible in action

  • Tell coherence stories: circulate short case studies where alignment created outsized results

Signals you are progressing

  • Teams make consistent trade-offs without escalation

  • New joiners navigate quickly because context is easy to find

  • Values show up in calendars and budgets, not just posters

Pitfalls

  • Culture as campaign or slogan

  • Values that are aspirational but unactionable

Culture becomes less about control and more about continuity. It is how collective memory turns into collective momentum.

The Weavist cycle

How the disciplines interact

The four disciplines are movements in a continuous spiral.

  1. See the Threads: frame the reality that is shaping behaviour

  2. Work the Loom: design structures that make the right behaviours easy

  3. Find the Pattern: create shared interpretation that guides choices

  4. Create the Fabric: embed the meaning so it persists under pressure

Then repeat. Each loop increases fidelity and resilience. Awareness informs design. Design enables better synthesis. Synthesis strengthens culture. Culture widens awareness.

Practical cadence

  • Monthly: refresh the framing and retire stale metrics

  • Fortnightly: run learning reviews that change one interface or rule

  • Weekly: publish a short pattern note that names what is emerging

  • Daily: practise a micro-ritual that ties action to purpose

Visual metaphor: the fabric spiral

Do not imagine a pyramid. Picture a spiral of thread coiling upward. Each rotation integrates what you learned last time. From above, it looks like a clear pattern. From within, it feels like growth. This is how coherence scales: not by adding more control, but by adding more connection.

Field checklist: start this quarter

  • Identify three hidden assumptions shaping your biggest program

  • Replace one gate with a clear interface and visible service contract

  • Retire two reports and add one sensemaking note that names a real pattern

  • Introduce one ritual that makes a stated value tangible every week

Next
Next

Beyond the T-Shape